Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping industries worldwide and the construction sector is no exception.
This article provides insights into how AI impacts the building industry, including its benefits challenges—all through a legal lens. As a lawyer, I have firsthand experience with how AI can assist legal professionals and clients alike while being aware of its risks and limitations, particularly in the construction industry.
Artificial Intelligence refers to technology capable of performing tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as ‘learning’, ‘analysing’ and ‘reasoning’ . AI learns from experience, adapts to new inputs and performs human-like tasks.
AI is transforming the construction industry in numerous ways:
AI assists in creating efficient, innovative designs, optimising layouts and predicting structural performance. Generative design tools enable architects to explore multiple design alternatives efficiently.
AI enhances project management by optimising resource allocation, tracking progress in real-time and ensuring budget adherence. AI-powered scheduling tools assist in contract drafting and review, reducing human workload and improving efficiency.
AI streamlines the contract negotiation process by identifying standard clauses, detect anomalies and suggest revisions. AI-powered tools assist in contract drafting and review, reducing human workload, improving efficiency.
AI improves safety protocols by analysing historical data to predict hazards, monitoring vital signs, and suggesting preventive measures. It also automates incident reporting and provides actionable insights to prevent future accidents
For more information on Security of Payment, see our resources here.
AI is increasingly adopted in legal practices, including:
While AI can reduce the administrative burden for legal professionals, it is not yet capable of drafting a sophisticated contracts or legal documents with precision. As already explained above, AI-generated legal research also remains prone to error.
Recently, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of NSW issued a practice note (Practice Note SC 23) (Practice Note) which substantially restricts the use of AI in preparation of court documents. The Practice Note highlights the shortcomings of AI. It states:
“Legal practitioners and unrepresented parties should be aware of limits, risks and shortcomings of any particular Gen AI program which they use. These may include:
a) the scope for “hallucinations”, that is, the generation of apparently plausible, authoritative and coherent responses but which are in fact inaccurate or fictitious. Examples include false citations and fabricated legislative, case or other secondary references;
b) the dependence of Gen AI on the quality and reach of underlying data sets, including the possibility that that underlying database(s) may include misinformation or selective or incomplete data, data that is not up to date or data that is not relevant in New South Wales or Australia;
c) the scope for biased or inaccurate output including by reason of the nature or limitations of the underlying data sets;
d) the fact that any search requests via a chatbot or interactions or prompts within a Gen AI program may, unless disabled, be automatically added to the large language model database, remembered and used to respond to queries from other users;
e) the lack of adequate safeguards, to preserve the confidentiality, privacy or legal professional privilege that may attach to information or otherwise sensitive material submitted to a public Gen AI chatbot; and
f) the fact that data contained in a Gen AI data set or database may have been obtained in breach of copyright.”
While the Practice Note permits the use of AI in preparation of general chronologies and indexes, it prohibits the use of AI in drafting key court documents such as affidavits, witness statements or other evidentiary material.
Legal practitioners are prohibited from using AI to draft court documents without obtaining the court’s permission and expert witnesses are not to use AI in drafting their reports without the leave of the Court.
AI has made significantly improved convenience in our daily lives. However, it remains in its early stage of development and is not yet capable of handling complex tasks such as legal research, contract drafting or interpreting legal documents with precision.
Businesses should be very mindful of the commercial and legal risks associated with using AI in negotiating contracts or legal drafting.
excellence@kreisson.com.au
02 8239 6500